Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0360220140550121793
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2014 Volume.55 No. 12 p.1793 ~ p.1799
The Clinical Efficacy of the Haigis Formula Using A-Scan Contact Ultrasound Biometry
Park Keun-Heung

Cho Young-Mo
Lee Jong-Soo
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of the Haigis formula compared to other formulas using contact ultrasound biometry.

Methods: This study was performed on 94 patients (114 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery in our hospital. Axial length (AXL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured using both A-scan and intraocular lens (IOL) Master¨Þ. Patients were divided into three groups based on AXL; Group I (AXL < 22.5 mm), Group II (22.5 mm ¡Â AXL < 25.5 mm), and Group III (AXL ¡Ã 25.5 mm). Before cataract surgery, predicted refraction was calculated using the Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas using both A-scan and IOL Master¨Þ measurements. Mean absolute error (MAE) were analyzed at one month after surgery using the various IOL formulas.

Results: Using contact ultrasound biometry, in Group I, MAE of Haigis was 0.80 ¡¾ 0.67 D and was significantly lower than that using SRK/T. In Group II, the Haigis MAE was 0.72 ¡¾ 0.55 D and was significantly lower than the results of all other formulas. In Group III, the Haigis MAE was 0.76 ¡¾ 1.13 D and not significantly different from the results of other formulas. Comparing MAE of A-scan to IOL Master¨Þ, the Haigis formula showed 0.16 D higher error that decreased when the AXL was close to the normal range.

Conclusions: Using contact ultrasound biometry, the Haigis formula provided the best predictability of postoperative refractive outcome compared to other formulas in eyes with normal axial length.
KEYWORD
A-scan, Axial length, Cataract, Haigis formula, IOL formulas
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø